Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Friday, November 22, 2024 at 11:09 AM
Ad

Letter from the editors -- Fallon Media Responds to Community on Fatal Crash

Letter from the editors -- Fallon Media Responds to Community on Fatal Crash

Both Editor Rachel Dahl from The Fallon Post and Editor Emeritus Steve Ranson from the Lahontan Valley News have been working together on the accident that killed a young Fallon boy, Jaiden Barajas, on Friday. Our community has also been rocked by the death of Miya Bentsen, who was also killed as a result of a crash, and Cesar Alvarado-Jauregui, whose body was discovered Friday morning.

Our comments, though, are in reference to Jaiden’s death. We are proud with the community and their support for attending a candlelight vigil and for their generous donations on GoFundMe for Jaiden. There is also a GoFundMe page for Miya.

Until the investigation is completed, too many people are jumping to conclusions. We are including information we have already posted plus additional information to explain how this investigation will unfold. Before a name can be released, the suspect must be booked. This is part of the due process provided by the Nevada Revised Statutes and U.S. Constitution. Once the investigation is complete and charges made, his name is released.

Legally, media outlets are supposed to refrain from releasing a name prematurely or giving identifying information such as profession. Let’s say if a suspect is found innocent, and he/she has been tried by the press or Facebook as guilty, then the media out could be singled out for libel. Court cases have also occurred where a libelous comment posted by a Facebook user may also result in libel.

Let us also issue a plea for our readers. Please do not release that information in your postings. Our Facebook sites are open and can be viewed by anyone to include law enforcement and defense attorneys if the case goes to trial. We ask you to refrain from posting details so a jury pool does not become tainted. There have been incidences in other Nevada counties where the trial had to be tried in another jurisdiction because of this.

The investigation should not be played out on Facebook.

Results are submitted to the District Attorney’s office. NHP is conducting the investigation because of a conflict of interest with the CCSO. The investigation includes witness reports, toxicology and traffic. The turnaround on toxicology reports may take as short as one to two weeks, but the normal time is closer to three to four weeks. This is normal for all cases, not just the ones in Churchill County.

The Washoe Crime Lab processes all the evidence and issues a report, so you can see one lab handles many jurisdictions in Northern Nevada and is not just restricted to traffic fatalities.

In cases such as this and others that result in a blood test and additional investigation, usually the suspect is not booked or held on bail because no charges have been filed. This procedure has also occurred when a motorist was texting and hit a person, a “self-defense” shooting or stabbing, etc. Each case, though, is different.

Over the years, both the courts — federal and state — and the legislature have put in a number of steps and procedures to follow. First and foremost, is due process. A suspect is considered innocent until proven guilt, which would occur after charges have been filed, and whether the suspect opted to plead guilty or have a jury trial to proclaim his innocence.

If any of you remember the fatal crash in the crosswalk by city hall earlier this year, the investigation took two months to complete, and the name of the driver was not released until the report was made public. The Washoe Crime Lab processed the information, and then charges were filed by the DA’s office once his office received the results.

We reached out and talked to a law enforcement officer in another county who specializes in DUI enforcement. He also confirmed the steps and quickly cited the Nevada Revised Statutes officers must follow.

Furthermore, he said the goal is to present an iron-clad case so a defense attorney (if the suspect pleads not guilty) tries to fight the charges. The goal for any prosecutor is to get a conviction.

By statute and until authorities receive results of the blood test, they don’t have conclusive proof if the driver is above the legal limit. Being at or over .08 carries a more serious charge of as a DUI than being under which may not constitute a DUI. Penalties for DUIs are stiffer.

In conclusion, law enforcement will not release information until an investigation is finished or a major development occurs. We understand law enforcement has met with the family. Like us, you will have to wait until the report becomes available. The investigation should not play out on Facebook.

 

 

 

 

 

 


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

E. Smith 10/14/2020 11:48 AM
Sadly, it did play out on Facebook and now two families are mourning their loved ones.

A Desert Dog 10/04/2020 09:29 AM
This is good information, but it's too bad news editors have to teach grown adults about civics -- something everyone should have learned about in school.

Stanley B 10/02/2020 02:02 PM
The editors seem to be trying to help outraged people understand that the investigation will take time. I don’t read any ulterior motives in their explanation. They are trying to prevent assumptions from being used against social media commenters when the facts come out, in case the facts don’t support current opinions. Toxicology takes weeks and may be required by the driver’s insurer as well, which is why they don’t use breathalyzer results. They need to know if you have any prescriptions or other drugs in your system while operating the vehicle.

Sara M 10/01/2020 05:44 AM
This is very well written. Thank you for the great information and the reminder of the constitutional rights we should all hold very dear.

C. Huff 09/30/2020 05:11 PM
Excellent and unbiased article regarding the unfortunate Jaiden accident.

Tammy 09/30/2020 04:14 PM
I absolutely love the fact about libel regarding a Facebook user. Remember that even though you are faceless behind a keyboard, you can be found.

Lorri Thompson 09/30/2020 02:13 PM
Great job explaining!

Nicole Mazzanti 09/30/2020 01:30 PM
In my opinion,If a child died in result of an accident in which someone possibly caused.The suspect should be charged and held to prevent the possiblity of another accident happening while the investigation is on going.You would pray that the chance of another child getting killed would be prevented during investigation.Honestly was a breathalyzer not conducted at the scene? As a parent of four children, I grew up in this town and hearing the news is devastating of this young boy. And just reading this article the message definitely seems like its protecting a person that possibly killed a young boy,that due to previous profession, isn't being held accountable!I find it crazy that law enforcement would allow the person to be walking and driving the streets during pending investigation! Endangering other child in the community!I believe if it was my child that was killed I would want to warn other parents.Honestly many charges can hold a person in jail during investigation.And can also be amending to add or change a charge! This makes me mad and I feel the parents and community has every right to be worried or concerned about this person not being behind bars! Crap a parent can get charged for child endangerment for their child getting outside on accident and be thrown in jail and held. But this guy that possibly killed a young boy even if on accident isnt being held?That does seem right or fair to me! My heart goes out to this family!

Lisa Hilse 09/30/2020 12:37 PM
Im sure this will be removed... Im not in any way making light of the tragic deatjs of the above mentioned.. You publised a notice of death about a local doctor... And in that artical you also published things he was being charged with and not convicted of..seems as if journalism will only smear a name if it will get people to read it.

SUPPORT OUR WORK