Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Monday, November 25, 2024 at 4:31 AM
Ad

Ingram Pleads Not Guilty to Visual Pornography of Minor

Ingram Pleads Not Guilty to Visual Pornography of Minor
Christopher Colby Ingram. Photo courtesy CCSO.

Christopher Colby Ingram appeared in the Tenth Judicial District Court in Fallon on Monday, April 15, before Judge Thomas Stockard, facing allegations of probation violations and newer, much more serious charges. 

In January 2022, Ingram was granted probation on two consecutive suspended sentences of 38-96 months in prison for Embezzlement of Value of $3,500 or more and 22-56 months for Theft by Controlling Property of Another Person Value of $650 or more but less than $3,500. During proceedings, it was determined that Ingram violated the terms of his probation. A Status Hearing was set for May 21. 

The new charges against Ingram include allegations of: 

Count I) Unlawful Use of a Minor 14 Years of Age or Older in producing Pornography or as a Subject of Sexual Portrayal or Performance, a Category A Felony which carries a potential penalty of life in a Nevada State Prison with the possibility of parole after 35 years, a fine up to $100,000, lifetime supervision, and requires registration as a sex offender. 

Count II) Possession of Visual Pornography of a Person Under 16 years of age, a Category D Felony punishable by 1-6 years in prison, a fine of up to $5,000, lifetime supervision, and registration as a sex offender. 

Counts III-V) Gross Misdemeanor charges of Capturing Image of Private Area of Another Person, each count punishable by up to 364 days in jail and fines of up to $2,000 per count. 

Count VI) Misdemeanor of Failure to Register as an Ex-Felon with Law Enforcement within 48 Hours, which carries up to 180 days in jail and a fine of up to $1,000. 

Ingram, represented by Richard P. Davies and Joel B. Barber, Esquires, pleaded Not Guilty to all six counts and waived his right to a speedy trial. At the defense counsel's request, a criminal settlement conference will be scheduled to resolve the matter. The case will be heard before a jury if there is no agreement between the state and Ingram. A Status Hearing was set for May 21.


Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

SUPPORT OUR WORK