Go to main contentsGo to search barGo to main menu
Thursday, July 3, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Ad

Is Hate Speech Free Speech?

By Tom Riggins — The news seems to report almost daily of someone who is engaging in “hate speech.” Likewise, many if not most college campuses have “safe spaces” or something similar where students can retreat to an area where verbalization of something that might potentially offend someone else is forbidden.

The question is then, just what speech is legally and socially prohibited? This is a two-fold question because something that might be legal may be judged differently in the social realm.

The First Amendment to the Constitution deals with five different rights. That amendment reads as follows: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Therefore, government cannot make a law infringing these rights. Specifically, establishment of a religion, including one’s right to choose which religious facility to attend or to not attend at all. The founders did not want a national religion to interfere with peoples’ lives. Freedom of speech is next. When you read the Federalist Papers this was intended to allow free expression of views and opinions, especially about government and its activities.

Next is freedom of the press. This was intended to eliminate a government-owned media and allow unrestrained oversight of government actions. In other words, the press is supposed to be the watchdog of government. As such, they are granted special privileges. With that comes additional responsibility. Fourth is the right to peaceably assemble. This means that anyone or any group can meet for a protest at a local BLM office, for example, or on the Senate steps. The key is peaceable. If the protest becomes violent, you no longer have First Amendment protection.

Finally is the right to petition the government. This is the right to gather signatures for or against legislation or laws. It also includes the right to lobby for or against such legislation.

OK, back to the original question. What is free speech? Well, it is almost anything. There are a few limitations placed by Supreme Court rulings. These are “well-defined and narrowly limited” as per that court. They include obscenity, defamation, fraud, incitement, true threats, and speech integral to already criminal conduct.

By that definition, there is no hate speech exception to the First Amendment. By the way, free speech extends also to the written word. Hateful ideas, which are subject to the interpretation of those hearing them, are not prohibited legally. Likewise, disparaging a particular race is legally protected speech. On the other hand, someone else is free to counter your statements with the same protections. Socially, you may be condemned (through free speech), but if you don’t care about that you can say what you want.

What can’t you say? The often cited example of yelling “Fire” in a crowded building is one example. That is considered incitement as it may cause bodily harm to panicked people trying to exit. Another exception is hurling personal insults at someone face-to-face that might be likely to start a fight. You may have seen news clips or YouTube videos of protesters making personal threats to others. They just lost their First Amendment protection.

Obscenity and fraud are straightforward. The last one, speech integral to already criminal conduct, is one you may not have heard of. Here is an example. Threatening to kill someone because of their race is not allowed. This is not because of a free speech violation but because it is illegal to commit or incite someone to commit murder. The threat is then speech integral to a criminal act.

Defamation is another prohibited act. You can’t say something that is untrue that damages the reputation of another. This is where libel and slander laws enter the scene. This may be hard to prove legally, as such damage to reputation is difficult to establish. Public figures, like actors and politicians, require an even higher standard of proof.

The bottom line is that, with a few exceptions, you can say whatever you want. Just be prepared for the social, not necessarily legal, consequences of an unpopular message.

Columns are the ideas of the author and do not necessarily reflect the objectivity of The Fallon Post.  

Share
Rate

Comment

Comments

July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 1
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 2
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 3
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 4
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 5
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 6
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 7
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 8
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 9
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 10
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 11
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 12
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 13
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 14
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 15
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 16
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 1Page no. 1
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 2Page no. 2
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 3Page no. 3
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 4Page no. 4
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 5Page no. 5
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 6Page no. 6
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 7Page no. 7
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 8Page no. 8
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 9Page no. 9
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 10Page no. 10
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 11Page no. 11
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 12Page no. 12
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 13Page no. 13
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 14Page no. 14
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 15Page no. 15
July 4, 2025 -Fallon Gears Up for a “Bee-autiful”  - page 16Page no. 16
COMMENTS
Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I knew Sam as a member of our church growing up. He always had a warm smile, a kind word, and a great sense of humor! He will be great missed!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:57 AMComment source: Obituary -- Samuel Bruce WickizerComment author: Mike HinzComment text: Great teacher, great coach, but even a better person!!! Rest in peace Mr. BeachComment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:53 AMComment source: Obituary -- Jack Victor Beach, Jr.Comment author: Mike HinzComment text: I had Mrs Hedges for First Grade at Northside Elementary in 1969. I still, to this day, remember her as a wonderful teacher…one of my favorites!!Comment publication date: 7/2/25, 11:29 AMComment source: Obituary - Nancy Marie Hedges C Comment author: Carl C. HagenComment text: What are MFNs and PBMs ?? ............................ From the editor: This is a very good question and we apologize for not catching that wasn't in there. We reached out to the writer/submitter and got this info back...hope it's helpful. PBM: Pharmacy Benefit Managers are pharmacies that are owned by insurance companies. (CVS is one.) They negotiate with drug makers to get reduced pricing for medications, but they historically have not passed along those savings to patients. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/pharmacy-benefit-managers-staff-report.pdf MFN: Most Favored Nation pricing is a policy that means a country agrees to offer the same trade concessions (like tariffs or price reductions) to all member nations of the World Trade Organization (WTO). When applied to pharmaceuticals, it could disrupt global access, deter innovation, and obscure the deeper systemic issues in American health care. https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2025/05/22/the-global-risks-of-americas-most-favored-nation-drug-pricing-policy/Comment publication date: 6/23/25, 7:47 AMComment source: L E T T E R TO THE EDITOR
SUPPORT OUR WORK